this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
1579 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

58111 readers
4652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

USB keeps changing their own standard every 2 years why bother learning it.

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Pshh, speak for yourself. I'm ready for USB 3.2 gen 5 pro ultra max

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But will that be better or worse than USB 3.3 gen 2 extra super speed?

[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Both, of course.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Will USB 3 get an update now USB4 is out?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, USB4 is basically what USB 3.3 would've been, but with fresh branding. I expect it to have the same naming issues after a few updates...

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wasn't USB4 based on Thunderbolt 3?

Sort of? It borrows a lot of the high speed protocol bits from Thunderbolt 3, but I think it does DP a little differently (at least it supports different DP standards than TB3). So it's closely related, but not necessarily the same thing.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Was that the first one that had M Bison as a playable character?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

We're not calling it that anymore. It's been rebranded to "SuperDuper Speed USB ]|[" now. Note that this is a different standard than the previous "SuperDuper Speed USB 3," and under no circumstances should you call it "SuperDuper Speed USB 3.0," because there was never any such spec and pedantic nerds will climb up your nose in the comments if you ever utter it.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago
[–] s_s@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, they update the standard to add new things. Is that bad?

[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They also change existing terms for no good reason.

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The don't.

But give me an example of what you're talking about. I'll explain.

[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] s_s@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The consumer facing names for those transmission specs are and have always been:

  • SuperSpeed 10 Gbps

  • SuperSpeed 20 Gbps

Unless you're designing your own circuits you don't need to worry about signaling rates (ie "Gen") or lane configuration (Z×Y).