this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37602 readers
409 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any "Decentralized" Solution that is not F.O.S. free and opensource was never "Decentralized" at all... If it was F.O.S. there would without a doubt be other instances already.

[–] jmk1ng@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://github.com/bluesky-social

Even their web and mobile clients are FOSS

The FUD and misinformation on here about Bluesky an AT is wild

[–] emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

MIT≠FOS

GNU is Free and forever free software... MIT not so much.

https://fossbytes.com/open-sources-license-type/

[–] jmk1ng@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like we're splitting hairs here. MIT is an extremely permissible license. The fact someone could take this and make a closed source fork doesn't affect the existence or openness of the MIT licensed releases