this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
444 points (97.2% liked)

News

22869 readers
4738 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Dude got nominated like an hour ago. How are they putting out articles like this?

Like the average person ain't even got home from work on the east coast.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People had a week to draft one for each VP candidate being vetted.

Like Carter’s obituary - write it now so you can publish it early.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are preloaded and ready to go. They probably have other articles in the can for the other names that were being considered as well.

It might also surprise you to know that major news networks pre-tape celebrity obituaries just in case that person dies.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

local58 is amazing; check out their other stuff :)

Walz has been known to be on the shortlist for at least a week, probably longer. They probably had articles like this in the pipeline for all the likely candidates.

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

The best one I found is this opening from cnn:

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz hadn’t been in the top tier of potential running mates for Kamala Harris until the past few weeks.

No shit!

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/06/politics/math-behind-harris-walz-vp-pick/index.html

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The campaign worked with news outlets and let them write the articles, under what's often called an embargo. Basically, in exchange for holding the story until it's announced, the journalists can write the story ahead of time.

Source: dated a girl who worked in PR and a girl who was in media relations for a large company

[–] logi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Can confirm.

Source: married to journalist who counts down the hours and triple checks the time zone math to avoid this.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Presumably various media outlets had articles prepared ahead of time for each of the possible outcomes.

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Big news sites will do things like write up a story announcing a presidential win for each of the candidates, then only publish the one that matters after the election. This way they can have a story on the front page within minutes (seconds these days) of having official results.

I wouldn't be surprised if Vox had 1 of these lined up for each of the likely VP picks. If not that, it certainly wouldn't be unusual for a journalist to do their homework on all of the candidates and to have the rough outline and some key facts ready to go for each. If you've already done most of the research, assembling the final story shouldn't take more than a couple of hours.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Its like how obituaries are written well in advance of notable people dying. They had this article written up for each person on Harris's list.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, he didn't just crawl out of a hole, he has a record. The article is making the claim that he has the potential to bring together different elements of the democratic party, which ultimately is the party of everyone else that isn't voting Trump. This is a big tent with a lot of perspectives, and while democrats are largely united against Trump, that doesn't inherently mean they're just as united behind the candidate (as we just saw), and those kind of things are ripe for Republicans to pick at and promote infighting.

[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because it’s Zach Beauchamp and he essentially hates the left.

I know everyone is giving you tidy, case-solving “it’s-always-like-this” responses, but indeed you are on to something.

Let the anti-anti corporate work begin (Walz and Harris being the [somewhat] anti-corporate).

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hmm... are you talking about Zack Beauchamp? Or someone else with publications that represent what you're saying?

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/6/20754828/el-paso-shooting-white-supremacy-rise

https://www.vox.com/politics/357963/republicans-white-identity-politics-newsletter

https://www.vox.com/politics/356824/liberalism-way-of-life-lefebvre

https://www.vox.com/politics/361136/far-right-authoritarianism-germany-reactionary-spirit

But whatever, facts don't matter here, considering how many comments want to trash this article (without reading past the title :) )