this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
29 points (75.4% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2521 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

All media has an agenda.

TFA cites papers, published in Nature no less; clearly it isn’t hogwash. Doesn’t mean that it’s as amazing as the article claimed, but to dismiss it as “having an agenda” is quite something.

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The article feels like it does have an agenda. The tech itself may be solid, but the way they phrase certain things makes it seem like this is some sort of “but big Pharma would kill it“ conspiracy article. Personally, I’ve wondered why we’re not doing more with UV pre/during/post-pandemic, although I’ve never heard of “far-UV”,

But an interesting read nonetheless