this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
540 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chipthemonk@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Would it be possible to have you fediverse username connected to the blockchain so you could use it to associate with an instance? And if that instance closed, say, you could simply connect your blockchain based account identity to another instance?

[–] GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Why would blockchain be necessary to do that? Honestly, 99% of the time blockchain is just a highly inefficient buzzword.

Usually there are better ways to achieve the same outcome, with the added bonus of not automatically attracting a cavalcade of Web3 con-artists and grifters.

[–] keardap@lemmy.selfhost.quest 3 points 1 year ago

Why would you need blockchain for that?

[–] Soki@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Why not use good old signatures for that?