this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
301 points (86.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35742 readers
3040 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title ☝️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 98 points 5 months ago (3 children)

To be fair, there are multiple instances and communities. If there was only one post, there’s no guarantee that everyone on the fediverse would see it.

The system is not designed to provide one consistent view of all its contents.

[–] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago (3 children)

If people would at least just check the community they're posting to, it would help immensely.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Cross-posting existing posts also helps immensely to cut down on the clutter. I've done that, from larger communities to smaller ones that I wanted to help grow. I've never tried changing the title to see if it still connects, but maybe so, if someone wanted/needed (for the specific rules of the community) to do that.

[–] adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thing is, a cross post is nothing special. It's a) a post with an identical link, and b) a post with "cross posted from..." appended to the body content.

It is still just a post. Lemmy (and k/mbin) just attempt to mask the fact there are multiple of them.

I don't know if it can be done any better though, ActivityPub has quite a few quirks.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

So if the title were changed from the original, it would still recognize it as a cross post, somehow? Perhaps based on it sharing an identical URL, or something added when you go into the cross-posting interface - if so then I suppose as you said the text in the body about the fact that it's cross-posted. Hrm, and phrased differently, if someone were to share an identical URL independently, so not going through the cross-posting interface at all, would Lemmy and K/Mbin still recognize it as a cross-post?

Thanks for that insight. So if OP meant from a traffic standpoint, then yeah I see it doesn't help at all. It also still splits the comments across the entire Fediverse, rather than concentrating them into like a megathread. And people could upvote multiple posts, and comment inside multiple ones, etc., so it actually increases traffic to have them split up, perhaps not quite as much as fully independent posts but more than if they were singular ones.

Whereas from a UX standpoint, it is so helpful to tidy things up to see e.g. one post shared to 5-20 communities rather than each of those showing up as its own individual post, taking up most of your feed even after you've already consumed the content and want to see what else is going on. And as we are seeing, each community has its own slant on the type of discussions that they want to have, so even if the posts could be conjoined somehow, into like a pseudo-megathread, the impact of that would hit very differently than allowing them to be different (cross-)posts. So cross-posting seems a nice balance between fully individual vs. fully conjoined:-).

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Still not that simple. A beehaw users could post something first and you and I wouldn't see it but others would.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What is beehaw, and why wouldn't we see it?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Soooooo, their logic is "we want to build a community" but also "we disagree with open registrations, and want to seperate from the two biggest instances on Lemmy".

That's like throwing a party, and then getting nervous when people show up.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That was a year ago, the fediverse was (and is) growing by leaps and bounds; basically all instances were dealing with DDoSes and huge waves of obviously scripted account-creation. AFAIK beehaw federates with both of those instances again.

I'm pretty ambivalent about federation. If an instance wants to be a private forum and not federate that's up to them and a valid use case I guess. I personally prefer instances that federate with basically everyone and let me block per user/instance myself but to each their own.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

and let me block per user/instance myself but to each their own.

What?! No, that's censorship! Let us do the blocking.

/s

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They did it so early I'm not sure how much of that was an issue. And no, while they did say it could be reversed later on, it never has been. Last I heard they were considering leaving Lemmy entirely.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just checked and you're right.

But still, that's the beauty of federation to me, they're still using the same interoperable standard so if I want to see them I can spin up my own instance or find one of the ones they still federate.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Agreed, that's their prerogative. It did seem to stunt their growth but without wanting to take on more admins they may be fine with that.

[–] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If people would at least just check the community they're posting to, it would help immensely.

Added emphasis to previous statement.

[–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It still wouldn't help. If two instances block each other, but neither of them blocks a third instance, and someone from one of the first two joins a community in the third, then that person won't see posts in that community from members of the blocked instance.

[–] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It would make a difference is all I'm saying.

Perfect and better are not mutually exclusive concepts.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This was still an issue in Reddit times, but usually a single thread would rise to the top.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some of us are mods and have to rawdog "new". Lol

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Doing god’s work

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

I think it would help if people used the cross posting feature

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Along with posts from multiple agencies driving traffic.