this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
1291 points (86.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26660 readers
3436 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 25 points 4 months ago (5 children)

In their moral justification, the argument of the lesser evil has played a prominent role. If you are confronted with two evils, the argument runs, it is your duty to opt for the lesser one, whereas it is irresponsible to refuse to choose altogether. Its weakness has always been that those who choose the lesser evil forget quickly that they chose evil.

-Hannah Arendt, German-American philosopher and political theorist, in fuckin 1964 lmao. some things never change!

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So, explain how not voting assures us that we don't get Trump again.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Simple. If nobody votes, neither candidate will win.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to assume that you're being sarcastic.

For those who think this is an option, remember that the MAGoos vote in every election.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

IMO the disconnect lies in the fact that many don’t see Biden as the “lesser evil.” They want to vote for Biden, because they’ve been influenced to think it is the only option.

Arendt is making an observation of a “no-win situation”.

Voters want a solution to that situation, so they make assumptions to come to a conclusion that fits the narrative they tell themselves.

Some, when faced with a no-win situation, choose to not play the game. Others, convince themselves that the lesser-evil is a desirable outcome. Many, myself included, want to "change the conditions of the test.".

There is no viable solution. All choices are valid and should be respected.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The only way to change the conditions of the test is to get out and support Left-leaning Dems in primaries.

And no, not all choices are valid. Voting doesn't just affect the voter, it affects the whole country.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You have no idea what I’m trying to communicate and it’s disconcerting to me. It’s a failure on my part to communicate effectively. I’m sorry.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Keep at it. You learn by doing something; making a mistake; then doing it again a little better.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m going to assume, from your replies, that you don’t think this election is a no-win situation?

But others do, which is illustrated in OP’s Arendt comment. Those concerns are material, whether true, or not. Dismissing vote abstainers, or third party voters, doesn’t address those concerns. Only Biden and the DNC can do that.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or, people could look at the situation as it is.

Trump and his MAGoos are going to do everything they can to take as many rights away from people as they can.

In the real world of 2024, the only option is Joe Biden.

There's no magical super candidate that's going to pop up between now and November.

With the latest Supreme Court decision, re-elected President Trump could deputize 5 million of his followers on Inauguration Day.

You don't have to love Joe Biden, or even like him. Just realize that Trump is for full on fascist takeover of the US and Biden isn't.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who are we going to vote for when Trump suspends elections?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Mine too… jinx.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Then Congress would appoint the President. If, somehow, a Congress was also not elected, then the states would likely send delegates to do the same thing, but not all of Congress is even up for election.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

Yeah the Nazis would've never come to power if everyone just abstained from voting instead of coalescing under one lesser evil /s

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It’s a frigging figure of speech. It doesn’t literally mean both options are “evil” anytime it is used. And you’re not “choosing evil” by voting for Biden — not for the people whose lives will be ruined if Trump wins. For many you are preventing evil.

If a few more people in a few states had chosen the “lesser evil” of Hillary over Trump, the Supreme Court wouldn’t be delivering supreme evil every few months for the foreseeable future.

(I don’t need to hear about how Hillary did a bad job in the election — it doesn’t change the fact that the consequences are what they are.)