117
submitted 4 days ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

Sixty-two Democrats joined 207 Republicans in supporting the amendment, while Democratic leadership, which typically offers a suggestion on which way to vote, gave “no recommendation.”

We got to have more standards than "not a Republican".

These assholes in sheep clothing aren't on our side.

Like, it doesn't matter if you're at "the cool table" if Nazis start sitting down and no one throws them out, you don't keep fucking sitting with the Nazis. You start a new table.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 14 points 4 days ago

How can you organize voters with a district like the Texas 33rd?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

*citation needed

Let’s see evidence of “the internet” solving extreme gerrymandering

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago

The question was:

How can you organize voters with a district like the Texas 33rd?

I said "the internet"...

And now you're demanding I prove checks notes something else no one else has been talking about?

Why?

[-] bobburger@fedia.io 6 points 4 days ago

What is wrong with you? It's very clear that the issue that makes organizing in the Texas 33rd is the extreme gerrymandering. What question did you think you were answering when you confidently answered "the interenet"? Were you just saying random shit hoping no one would call you out on your bullshit?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Look, they're apparently never wrong about anything and when they say "the internet," they mean it. Fact. End of.

Edit: and reading below, it's gone from "you can use the internet to organize to fix a problem like Texas' third district's gerrymandering" to "the internet has been used to organize people politically sometimes." Very helpful and relevant!

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I said "the internet"... And now you're demanding I prove…

I asked you to prove your claims. (if you can’t, of course, nobody should believe them). Not something unrelated. But thanks for the

Red Herring

red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question.[1] It may be either a logical fallacyor a literary device that leads readers or audiences toward a false conclusion. A red herring may be used intentionally, as in mystery fiction or as part of rhetorical strategies (e.g., in politics), or may be used in argumentation inadvertently.[2]

Why don’t you just answer the question?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago

How can you organize voters with a district like the Texas 33rd?

I said “the internet”…

That was "my claim".

That "the Internet" is how you would organize people in a sprawling district because that doesn't rely on geography and in person meetings. It's also just how you do shit now.

Then you asked me:

Let’s see evidence of “the internet” solving extreme gerrymandering

And acting that I claimed it could. When I never said that because I was answering a completely different question.

The only way that makes sense, is if you dont know what me or that other person was talking about.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That was "my claim".

Backed up with nothing but excuses and self-serving bullshit. You have zero evidence to back up your “claims” …

Blaming me for calling you out and then blaming both me and others for your own actions and their consequences is textbook projection.

Facing the consequences of your actions is not a state of victimhood

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago

Backed up with nothing but excuses and self-serving bullshit. You have zero evidence to back up your “claims” …

...

Wait...

So you want evidence that someone can use the Internet to organize politically?

I gotta admit, I didn't see that coming.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357176371_Online_political_participation_the_evolution_of_a_concept

I'm willing to put the time in, I think we can do this. Please don't hesitate to keep asking if you don't get it yet.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

that’s a fine song and dance you do.

let me know when you can back up you claims with evidence, instead of showing ed hearings...

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

So...

To you, a link about how people can organize politically online....

Isn't evidence that people can organize politically online?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
117 points (94.7% liked)

News

21693 readers
3943 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS