this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
57 points (95.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5186 readers
552 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
57
The climate case for mock meats is clear. But who can afford them? (grist.org)
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

All the plant-based options I see in my store are cheaper than actual meat. But then, the biggest brand I see is Morningstar Farms. I don't know how much Impossible Meat is because nobody around here carries it, but I would imagine it's a bit pricey just for the name being so popular.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That’s wild. Are you in the US? I can’t think of a supermarket near me that doesn’t stock Impossible and Beyond

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I am indeed in the US. The only places I can find impossible or beyond meat around here are restaurants that have those meatless options. And since Burger King was found to not actually be using the Impossible patties for the Impossible Whopper at one point, I don't trust that I've even really tried the alternative but had just been given a regular Whopper.

[–] BuckenBerry@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I can't find a source for that bk claim, where did you learn about it?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Source on the BK thing? Seems like that should’ve been a bigger deal

[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Don't know about the states, but in Finland the Burger King doesn't use impossible patties but instead patties from the vegetarian butcher.

Though I guess if the product is called "impossible whopper" then it probably should be done with impossible patties.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

I don’t know how much Impossible Meat is because nobody around here carries it, but I would imagine it’s a bit pricey just for the name being so popular.

Having tried a fairly wide variety of vegan meat replacements, I personally found that Impossible meat was the most impressive. Their beef imitation is quite literally indistinguishable from the real thing. If anything, it's beefier than real ground beef. I can sometimes find it on sale at my local store for about $7 or $8 a pound, but usually it's more around $10 or $11. I always stock up on the beef or sausage when it's on sale, as my non-vegan family has fully embraced it, whereas they have been less receptive of other beef imitations (though they'll enjoy any old imitation chicken, which appears to be easier to replicate).