this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
712 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

55744 readers
2739 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (51 children)

Could someone eli5 risc-v and why the fuss?

Edit: thanks for the replies. Searchingnfurther, this 15 min video is quite well made and told me more than I need to know (for now) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps0JFsyX2fU

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 106 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

RISC-V (pronounced risk five), is a Free open-source Instruction Set Architecture (ISA). Other well established ISA like x86, amd64 (Intel and AMD) and ARM, are proprietary and therefore, one must pay every expensive licenses to design and build a processor using these architectures. You don't need to pay a license to build a RISC-V processor, you only need to follow the specifications. That doesn't mean the CPU design is also free, no, they stay very much the closed property of the designer, but RISC-V represents non the less, a very big step towards more transparency and technology freedom.

[–] StitchIsABitch@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I pity the five year old who has to read this.

I'm a grown up though so thank you for the explanation.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago
[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, I admit it's still a pretty complex explanation. I gave it my best shot :)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)