this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
375 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

57418 readers
4308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

See, Apple? Even cars can do it :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Honestly, I think it may be possible to build entire roads with enough crushed metal elements in the asphalt/concrete and a slight low power charge throughout the entire surface would be able to keep any vehicle battery at a steady charge.

You might be underestimating how much power a car consumes while driving. For example, a Tesla model 3 has an efficiency of about 130 Wh/km in mild weather at highway speeds. Assuming that on the highway you'll travel 100 km/h, that means you'll use 130*100 = 13.000 Wh/h, a constant power draw of 13kW. That's enough to power perhaps 8-12 houses on average.

A km of road could have, let's say, 200 cars on it (4 lanes, 20m per car). That means you'd need to pump about 2.6 megawatts of power into every kilometer of road to keep them all topped up.

EDIT: fucked up math

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

And that doesn't seem to take into account transmission losses. Even the best wireless phone chargers are maybe 70% efficient. This may hit 40% if you're lucky. So double that figure.

[–] Sentient_Modem@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does using a period in your number not cause confusion? 13.000 vs 13,000. I first read it is 13 since the zeros mean nothing following a period where im from. No shade, just curious.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apologies. I'm from a country where the meaning of the period and comma is reversed compared to the US, so I did it this way out of habit.

[–] Sentient_Modem@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No need to apologize. I didn’t know they were reversed. Do yall do periods for three digits? 1.000.000,00?

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

Yup, just like that