this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
567 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

55919 readers
3240 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
567
ISPs seek halt of net neutrality rules before they take effect next month (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 month ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Way different than a federally funded ISP. Note the comment OP is making.

[โ€“] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 6 points 1 month ago

Not so far off, providing infrastructure locally then leaves a lot of the major transit to backbone carriers to make the interconnects. Those providers are largely transparent to the end users. Now nationalizing carriers like that would be a hefty lift, but if we can take the local service out of the ISPs hands it would let the municipal hosts negotiate those peering arrangements in bulk. How many towns are well equipped to handle that might be another matter though.