this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
43 points (83.1% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

3 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A lack of cultural nostalgia attached to the toy and wariness of the film's feminist messaging may have kept the Korean audience away from the Hollywood mega-hit: "There is no real fan base for 'Barbie' in Korea.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There is a huge debate in South Korea over feminism. I'm not Korean, but I've read a lot that Korean men do get special treatment from the government, colleges, and workplaces, but mostly for their mandatory military service. The argument seems to be that if women want the same treatment, they're free to sign up for military service.

[–] kamenoko@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe the issue is compelling your citizens to join your military in the first place?

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The common understanding is with DPRK ready to go at any given moment in theory that they need the population to be trained just in case.

[–] kamenoko@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then it seems pretty sexist to leave women out of the opportunity to effectively defend themselves in case North Korea ever attacks.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that why men say that if they want to get the same privileges they should enroll as well?

The caviat is that the mandatory service is two years long, which most Korean women don't want to waste in the military

[–] kamenoko@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No rational human should ever want to waste 2 years of their life learning how to kill.

[–] Axium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's a perfectly reasonable thing to learn whilst still technically at war with a tyrannical socialist neighbour.

[–] firewyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was an incredibly stupid thing to say when their only direct neighbor wants them all dead.

[–] kamenoko@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the threat is that large then it should be no issue to have a standing, regular army instead of forced conscription.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sock@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i also think blackmailing women into joining the military is a sustainable idea

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Oh, but I guess totally okay to blackmail men because they're disposable

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Makes sense for a country still technically in a civil war, I guess.