this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
812 points (97.9% liked)

memes

10680 readers
3436 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Lmao. It's going to be another dude. You know it. I know it. He knows it. 😉

[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Actually you'll just be alone and some chad will have 2-3 girlfriends.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well if it's too expensive to be single, suicide it is I guess 🤷‍♂️

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It doesn’t work. You just end up here again

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Boo! I want a refund, this game is broken pay 2 play bullshit!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Just moneyball the problem and get two or three boyfriends instead

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's...not polyamory. That's a harem.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's poly if the girls have two girlfriends and a boyfriend

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Gigan indicated that certain men will have multiple female partners while other men will have none. This implies that they believe that those female partners will be tied to that one man and won't have the ability to take on any other male partners should they choose to. Such a situation is not polyamory as it is not equitable to all parties.

Should two women choose to be partnered with each other and a man, and should all parties exercise their free will (i.e. not out of pressure) in deciding to be polyfidelitous, then that could be considered polyamory. But it doesn't necessitate that those "Chads" horde all of the women leaving some straight men with no potential partners. It's a ridiculous implication.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah under polyamory the only reason some men might lose out on a girlfriend they may have in monogamy is if they’re merely better than nothing. And the guys with multiple poly girlfriends aren’t “chads” they’re the kind of guy who can have a good time hanging out with their wife’s partners.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ugh I wish I was a bi bro then I'd be in heaven either way 😩

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You don't have to be bi to be poly though.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Generally speaking, you do. But since one is sexual and the other is amorous, you don’t.

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, you don't. Polyamory ≠ Triad (three people all in a relationship together). Triads are certainly a form polyamory can take, but a very small percentage of polyamorous people are in one. They just happen to be way over represented in media which causes people to assume that that's what polyamory is. I know a whole lot of polyamorous people; none of them are in a triad, and most of the men and some of the women are straight.