this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
236 points (84.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21607 readers
971 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    236
    I respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful project (slrpnk.net)
    submitted 7 months ago by tsugu@slrpnk.net to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Mio@feddit.nu 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I don't really see a problem with a snaps/flatpaks as long as they are not on application I use every day.

    But maybe it is easier if we have one standard instead of two.

    [–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Multiple standards are good, initially. Multiple visions and approaches can get tested. The best hopefully displaced the rest, whilst picking up all the other good ideas.

    If there was only one standard we would get stuck with snaps with no alternatives.

    [–] Mio@feddit.nu 0 points 7 months ago

    I look at this from the developers perspective. Only need to learn one is good.