this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

Science

12855 readers
59 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bpalmerau@aussie.zone 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Umm… correlation vs causation?? Anyone??

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 15 points 11 months ago

People seem to severely misunderstand what that phrase means.

It doesn't mean that every scientific article that says "X causes Y" is wrong because that implies correlation and therefore can't be the cause.

It just means that you generally can't say "X causes Y" if all you have is a correlation, and most people in eg. the environmental sciences actually do understand statistics better than the average member of the public whose understanding doesn't really go further than "correlation is not causation." So, no, correlation is not causation, but that's probably not news to the researchers

[–] Hyperi0n@lemmy.film 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe read the article instead of the title. I thought you people stayed over at Reddit.

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That’s what autotldr is for, silly! /s