Technology

37708 readers

402 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

154

Does enshitification happen because companies are publicly-traded? (beehaw.org)

submitted 6 months ago by hedge@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Isn't that a prerequisite for enshitification? Publicly-traded companies are required (by law, I think) to maximize profits for their shareholders, even if that means utterly ruining their original product (Reddit, Boeing, etc.), yes? What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Publicly-traded companies are required (by law, I think) to maximize profits for their shareholders,

The is not true, stop spreading misinformation

https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/04/16/what-are-corporations-obligations-to-shareholders/corporations-dont-have-to-maximize-profits

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They may not have to maximise profits but the shareholders will question every decision that doesn't maximise profits so the result is the same. That's why activist investors that push companies to more ethical behaviour are important.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They may not have to maximise profits but the shareholders will question every decision that doesn't maximise profits so the result is the same.

If that were true, we wouldn't see the obscene salaries of C-suite level execs skyrocket... That money cuts into the profits as well, you know?

They are ok squeezing their workers while giving themselves the sweet life on the company's dime

That's why activist investors that push companies to more ethical behaviour are important.

This is a fairy tale force, like Santa or the boogie man. You'll never get ethical behavior from profit seeking entities

[–] burningmatches@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, but we’ve had countless examples of loss-making tech companies with sky-high valuations. Amazon didn’t make a profit for something like 20 years. Investors of course want returns, but they can differ on the timeframe they’re willing to wait for them.