this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
171 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

55940 readers
3513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Are any under 16 buying the phones themselves? With the price of phones now I’d guess for the vast majority it is the parents themselves buy it for their kids.

At that point it’s for the parents to decide for themselves

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can still buy perfectly good phones for 1-200€ but yeah the blame still mostly lies with the parents imo.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The "blame" lies with no one except for the big social media megacorporations that develop and distribute addictive apps. Phone use by teenagers, or anyone else, is not intrinsically connected to any adverse effects. Rather, negative health consequences for children are the result of an unchecked, raging hypercapitalism.

Yes and no. I agree we should regulate these companies and make them partially responsible for the harm they cause, but you cant sue a knife company if your kid stabs someone. Its your responsibility to make sure your kids dont fall into the traps that exist in our world.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

I think most of them get an older phone from their parents.