Work Reform

9966 readers

366 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

482

California law would give employees the 'right to disconnect' during nonworking hours (www.usatoday.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Anyone tired of answering emails and calls from their boss after work may soon be protected by law in California.

A bill has been introduced in California legislature that would give employees the "right to disconnect" from their jobs during nonworking hours.

Assemblymember Matt Haney of San Francisco first introduced the bill, Assembly Bill 2751 in February, which would allow employees to disconnect from communications from their employer during nonworking hours.

If passed, California would be the first state to create a "right to disconnect" for employees. Similar laws have already been enacted in 13 countries, including Australia, Argentina, Belgium, France, Italy, Mexico, Portugal and Spain.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah "evening out hours" is usually referred to flex.

I had a job I literally did 90 hrs then 100 hours and the company gave me ONE day off the week after.

I was drowning and we succeeded. I got minimal recognition, a minor bonus (no where near enough to cover my OT) and only a day off. Spoke with the CEO as part of my kudos and he said we would get me my hours back.

My boss had other plans. Needed the coverage.

I started applying around after that.

[–] starlord@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I clarify with every job how many hours per week they're paying me to do. I've never worked a minute past my agreed time without a contract stating how many extra hours were required, how much extra wages that would require, and under what circumstances such a clause can be triggered.

I didn't realize others had so little control. It's really heartbreaking.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Super toxic workplaces...

Last job I had was salary and it was 40 hrs a week minimum with "additional hours as needed by business needs"

This usually meant after hours server administration but if there was an outage then it was all you can eat unpaid overtime.

The worst part is mandatory 9am to 5pm coverage so no "evening out hours"