this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1296 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2857 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1296
Roku explores taking over HDMI feeds with ads (www.lowpass.cc)
submitted 8 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
485 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Roku is exploring ways to show consumers ads on its TVs even when they are not using its streaming platform: The company has been looking into injecting ads into the video feeds of third-party devices connected to its TVs, according to a recent patent filing.  

This way, when an owner of a Roku TV takes a short break from playing a game on their Xbox, or streaming something on an Apple TV device connected to the TV set, Roku would use that break to show ads. Roku engineers have even explored ways to figure out what the consumer is doing with their TV-connected device in order to display relevant advertising.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] I_like_cats@lemmy.one 226 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The HDMI forum is run by big companies so that is not happening, sorry

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 153 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Death to HDMI. DisplayPort is the superior port.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure that a DisplayPort device in a chain can also inject video, but I have to admit that I would kind of like to not have two competing video standards, and my impression is that DisplayPort tends to lead HDMI technically, so...

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 86 points 8 months ago (2 children)

DisplayPort: We have

  • Higher maximum resolution.
  • Better support for higher refresh rates.
  • Multi-stream transport so you can use a single display cable for multiple monitors.

HDMI: Oh yeah? Well, we have

  • Royalties.
  • Specifications hidden behind contracts.
  • An emphasis on implementing DRM technology that makes it hard to use a capture card.

Fuck HDMI.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh and HDMI prevents open source GPU drivers supporting HDMI 2.1 natively.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That was covered under "Specifications hidden behind contracts"

[–] halva@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 8 months ago

An emphasis on implementing DRM technology that makes it hard to use a capture card.

Well, DP supports HDCP too.