this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
197 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37708 readers
402 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, and that definition has nothing in common with what the word means.

Autocorrect has plenty of information encoded as artifacts of how it works. ChatGPT isn't like autocorrect. It is autocorrect, and doesn't do anything more.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's fine if you think so, but then it's a pointless argument over definitions.

You can't have a conversation with autocomplete. It's qualitatively different. There's a reason we didn't have this kind of code generation before LLM's.

Adversus solem ne loquitor.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you just keep taking the guessed next word from autocomplete you also get a bunch of words shaped like a conversation.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I am not sure of the relevance of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter is the cravings of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter

Yeah, totally. Repeating the same nonsensical sentence over and over is also how I converse. 🙄