this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
596 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3496 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I remember those old games that would run faster to the point of hilarity if you put them on anything more modern than they were originally intended to run on. Like the game timing is tied to the frame rate.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

This was by and large the reason for the "turbo" buttons on all those 286 and 386 computers back in the day. Disengaging the turbo would artificially slow down your processor to 8086 speed so that all your old games that were timed by processor clock speed and not screen refresh or timers would not be unplayably fast.

Quite a few more modern games have their physics tied to frame rate -- if you manage to run them much faster than the hardware available at the time of their releases could, they freak out. The PC port of Dark Souls was a notorious example, as is Skyrim (at least the OG, non "Legendary Edition" or SE versions).

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It's embarrassing when a modern game does that. Game Programming 101 now tells you to keep physics and graphics loop timing separate. Engines like Unreal and Godot will do it for you out of the box. I'm pretty sure the SDL tutorials I read circa 2003 told you to do it. AAA developers still doing it on this side of 2008 should be dragged outside and shot for the good of the rest of us.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I didn't even know they still did it. I just remember games in the 80s and 90s doing that.

[–] Restaldt@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah its about time someone put down bethesda

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 months ago

On launch, Spyro: Reignited Trilogy had a level you couldn't complete unless you changed the settings to lock it to 30fps. It's probably been patched by now, but was that ever infuriating.

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

GTA SA 3 VC too

[–] Restaldt@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Oh you mean fallout 4?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

Command and Conquer Generals lets you choose game speed for skirmish matches, the natural cap of 60 and an option to uncap. You need superhuman reflexes to play with an uncapped speed on modern hardware !

[–] bcron@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

There used to be dip switches on some older machines (386/486 era), eventually 'turbo buttons' that accomplished the same thing, toggling would cut the clock speed so older software would be compatible with clock speed. Those turbo buttons were more a 'valet mode' than anything, but it all died out before the Pentium/Athlon era to say the least