this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
315 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

35134 readers
83 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Exactly.

Why can't I buy a decent dumb TV? I get that people want smart TVs, but surely there's a decent market for people who really don't need those features and would be happier with a simpler product. I'm absolutely part of that market, and I'm sure there are others.

I generally prefer simpler devices, and it was difficult buying a fridge with decent longevity (i.e. limited smart crap, ice maker in the freezer instead of fridge, etc). That's becoming more and more difficult, and large appliances have shorter and shorter lifespans (I had my compressor die twice in <10 years in my LG fridge... fridges used to last 15+ years).

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I generally prefer simpler devices, and it was difficult buying a fridge with decent longevity (i.e. limited smart crap, ice maker in the freezer instead of fridge, etc). That’s becoming more and more difficult, and large appliances have shorter and shorter lifespans (I had my compressor die twice in <10 years in my LG fridge… fridges used to last 15+ years).

I should say that my current fridge is 27 years old and has NEVER had a problem (other than over-stuffed crisper drawers being broken).

I was reading that the average life for a fridge is 10-15 years, and I can't honestly believe they are being made so poorly these days. They are such simple appliances, and I dread the day when I have to replace this one for a modern version.

But I'd love for my next TV to be a dumb TV. All the features my LG tv has just gets in the way of using it. LOL

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, after some research, LG in general is the worst, especially with their linear compressor. It failed after 2-3 years (under warranty), and failed again after 4-5 more years. We didn't bother fixing it again, since the repair people said it'd cost $600+ assuming the part is under warranty, and probably wouldn't last much longer anyway. Samsung is apparently similarly bad, but with different components. I liked this video, which goes over which fridge to get, and other resources say something similar: LG and Samsung are piles of crap (they're super fancy though), Whirlpool and GE are better if you avoid fancy features, and everything kind of sucks.

We went with Whirlpool this time, but everything I've read says the expected lifetime is still just 10-years. I don't want fancy features, I just want it to keep things cold, and I'd rather pay someone to fix it than replace it...

All the features my LG tv has just gets in the way of using it

Same. I have a Samsung "dumb" TV (~40", 1080p) from ~10 years ago and it's fine, and I have an LG "smart" TV (~55", 4k) from 5-ish years ago, which can be a pain to use and I'd prefer to just have a "dumb" TV instead. I even use the "smart" features sometimes, but they're slow and I'd get a much better experience with a small PC hooked up to it instead.

But it's incredibly hard to find non-smart TVs. There's a handful of "hospitality" TVs, but they're usually lower resolution, don't have nice features like OLED, and size seems to cap out around 40" at the biggest (most are 32"). I don't want any of the AI fixing crap, apps, etc, just give me a bunch of HDMI ports (ideally DisplayPort as well) and a decent picture.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I remember watching a recent program (one of those investigative consumer news shows), and I remember the LG problem you mentioned. A ton of people had an issue with that compressor, and LG just kept selling the damn things. Knock on wood, our LG washer and drier, and TV have been very reliable.

I’d get a much better experience with a small PC hooked up to it instead

That's what I do these days. Combined with media I have on my NAS, I don't need other "apps" or garbage nonsense on my TV. If only they made 60" computer monitors. LOL

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

LG just kept selling the damn things. Knock on wood, our LG washer and drier, and TV have been very reliable.

Apparently it's just their refrigerators that suck, just like with Samsung.

We have an LG washing machine and dryer, and other than one repair that I handled myself (logic board failure, so $150-200 repair), it has been solid. I also have an LG TV, and aside from the smart crap, it works pretty well (have had for >7 years now).

Combined with media I have on my NAS

The one feature I like about the smart TV is support for DLNA, which means I can stream video directly to it from my NAS. I have ripped many of our DVDs to the NAS so I don't need to go fiddle with disks to watch something. My Blu-ray player supports DLNA as well, so I don't really need the TV to support it, but it is somewhat convenient.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The one feature I like about the smart TV is support for DLNA

Yes, a nice feature that even early "smart" TVs had. It could have stopped at that and everyone would have been happy.

But today's smart TV's loaded with ads; unnecessary bloat; “shortcuts” to services you have no intention of ever using; massive user tracking; and complicated firmware/software that can render your TV useless, have become the real problems. It's the enshittification of hardware that really was just fine being "dumb".

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yup. I may end up getting a projector because the TV space has too much nonsense.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Just make sure it's not a "smart" projector! LOL

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

I liked this video, which goes over which fridge to get

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You can. Its called a monitor.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do they make >50" monitors? My wife was hoping for ~70" for our next TV...

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Find a commercial distributor in your area. Businesses buyarge commercial monitors for their offices, not smart TVs

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the tip, I'll take a look. I've mostly been looking at the typical tech shops (Newegg, Best Buy, etc), and they're all smart crap.

Edit: I took a look, and it seems prices aren't generally available online. Is that common, or do you have recommendations for distributors to look for?

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe try Tech Data, Ingram Micro, Synnrx, Mouser, etc

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Tech Data

Only this one had public product listings for large displays, and they were all 1080p (hoping for 4k, don't need QLED or OLED). That can maybe work, but I'd need to login to see prices, which is kind of annoying.

I'll ask around though. My company has several large screens, so I can probably ask where we get them from. However, they're often for conference rooms, so I'm guessing they're pretty expensive since they integrate with other expensive conferencing equipment.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if the integration logic is a separate unit from the actual monitor. Usually its a small computer box that just sends video to the monitor with HDMI.

That's exactly type of dumb monitor that you want

Yeah, if I can use it with just HDMI/DisplayPort and a remote and have no WiFi capability whatsoever, that's what I'm looking for. Ideally, it would have lots of ports (like >4) and not much else.

I'd really like 4k resolution, but I don't care about the rest of the features modern TVs have, and I can live without OLED. Our current TV (55"-ish) has 4k and I can still see pixels when somewhat close (like 5 feet away), so I don't really want to go down much in resolution when going up in size.

I just don't know much about the commercial offerings, so I'll have to ask around.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Mouser has public listings too

Right, but no large displays AFAIK. I go to them for small electronics and parts, but I didn't see anything about a 60"+ display.