I'm not worried about pornhub/redtube/xhamster/xvideos/chaturbate/only fans leaking info but more someone hacking in. There's a potential goldmine of blackmail/sextortion material from seeing what fetishes someone has.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Even if they do need to authenticate some digitalid, there's no need to store it and there's no reason for it to link to an individual person.

This is a very dangerous idea as is.

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And this won't even stop kids from finding porn. I think it is based on good intentions but they are too proud to say "yeha, maybe this has more cons than pros"

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's obviously not based on good intentions... how can you be this naïve? If a conservative says "but think of the children", you know fully well whatever they're proposing is not for the wellbeing of children.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

When a conservative says "think of the children", what they mean is "think of the queer kids that will be outed to their parents and sent to conversion therapy".

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 months ago

Does anyone have a copy of Mike Johnson’s ID? His son is in for a lot of notifications.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Also porn history is a really good clue to figuring out someone's sexuality and gender identity. And useful to conservatives for demonizing queer people as sexual deviants. I 100% believe this is an indirect way of harming queer people by outing them and their sexual interests.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 2 points 5 months ago

I'm hoping it happens to everyone all at once. Then another wave of sexual liberation can begin.