this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
635 points (99.2% liked)

Privacy

32492 readers
395 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm still just so furious at Signal management for removing compatibility with other text apps. I used to be constantly growing my Signal network, now it's a slowly shrinking rump that I never add anyone to.

[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Wasn't that compatibility based on SMS which is inherently insecure?

[–] UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right, the idea was that you could use Signal as your SMS app, and so whenever there was someone else doing the same you'd automatically upgrade to Signal. Whereas now I never have those auto-upgrades, any new contact I am just stuck on SMS with.

[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In my opinion, relying on upgrading users automagically to an encrypted and secure protocol isn't good practice. If someone wants to use an encrypted chat, they should do so consciously. It will only cause confusion otherwise.

Do people still use SMS these days though anyway?

I would have thought iMessage, RCS and separate chat apps like Whatsapp, Signal and WeChat would have largely replaced SMS by now.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

In my opinion, relying on upgrading users automagically to an encrypted and secure protocol isn’t good practice. If someone wants to use an encrypted chat, they should do so consciously. It will only cause confusion otherwise.

This is my theory for why they ditched this feature - the ultra-concerned about privacy superusers don't approve of its messiness, even though in practice it's the main engine for user growth.

Do people still use SMS these days though anyway?

I would have thought iMessage, RCS and separate chat apps like Whatsapp, Signal and WeChat would have largely replaced SMS by now.

SMS, MMS, iMessage and RCS are all compatible with each other and mostly used interchangeably and are the main way people text each other (in the US anyway). You just have a phone number, and when people text it with any of those formats you receive the message and respond the same way.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

On Android, it moved SMS messages from the shared SMS store upon receipt and to Signal's own database, which was more secure.