Technology

60052 readers

2968 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

313

Meet the Super DVD: Scientists Develop Massive 1 Petabit Optical Disk (gizmodo.com)

submitted 10 months ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Note: Unfortunately the research paper linked in the article is a dead/broken/wrong link. Perhaps the author will update it later.

From the limited coverage, it doesn't sound like there's an actual optical drive that utilizes this yet and that it's just theoretical based on the properties of the material the researchers developed.

I'm not holding my breath, but I would absolutely love to be able to back up my storage system to a single optical disc (even if tens of TBs go unused).

If they could make a R/W version of that, holy crap.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I will refrain from using the word "standard", but when it comes to data storage the most common terminology is in bytes, as I said TB(terabytes), GB, etc. Saying Pb(petabits) isn't as common and gimmicky imo when referring to a new disk storage technology. 125 TB is impressive enough without having to throw the Peta in there.

[+] odelik@lemmy.today -8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Researchers and low level technology engineers tend to work in bits. I don't have access to the full journal publication to verify, but it's likely that the journal publication used that number and that the Gizmodo author/editor that choose the title just didn't bother converting it to more "consumer friendly" terms.

However, the author did boast that it would be "125,000,000 GB!". So I'm gonna go with that this was an AI written article and doesn't really know what a technology reader would actually prefer to see.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

An LLM would absolutely know what the average reader would prefer to see, that’s kinda their whole schtick.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

The average (non-technical) reader would prefer to ~~see~~ click on the bigger number