this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
110 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

58092 readers
3731 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Stellantis CEO says Chinese EVs are ‘possibly the biggest risk’ facing his carmaker and Tesla::The owner of the Dodge, Jeep, and Chrysler brands aims to take on Chinese EVs while avoiding a “race to the bottom.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

The argument is that it is NOT a free market, because the Chinese cars are government subsidized. A Government subsidized company is not part of a free market.

[–] LightDelaBlue@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes. Absolutely, which makes it weird that Stellantis feel they need to warn Tesla, when they are very much beneficiaries in both USA and China.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And all the other US manufacturers.

[–] LightDelaBlue@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But go figure wen china do the same is bad .

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes it is bad when those subsidies reduce the price of the car (or any other product) to half of what the competition is charging. This puts the competition out of business and gives consumers less options. Once the competition is gone, the price shoots up past what it would be initially because we have no other option. They've done this countless times in many industries.

[–] LightDelaBlue@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They just use the same weapon as the conçurency so . Tbf money need be spend in city made for human not cars but it's a other story .

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Well frankly Western governments should also be subsidizing electric car production. If they actually want to move towards net zero, like they claim, it would be reasonable to expect them to actually do something to encourage greener technologies. Currently all they've done is said that they like it very much, and oh look let's build one or two wind farms.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Well frankly Western governments should also be subsidizing electric car production.

They are, EU governments give incentives and tax reductions to all EVs. That way all benefit equally, disregarding where the car was made, but EU is NOT subsidizing manufacturers illegally.
USA also has anti competitive regulation like China, but in USA you only get the benefits for cars made in USA, on top of that EV cars from China have a steep tax added.
Of the 3 biggest markets in the world, only EU is playing fair. But all have EV incentives.

[–] HauntingScience@programming.dev 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is no “fair” under capitalism. What I read from this is that the EU has failed its citizens on promoting and helping regional brands to compete on the global market.

When the global market speaks, you can either adapt or do nothing and complain. It’s clear which one is the path the EU is choosing.

[–] hagelslager@feddit.nl 3 points 7 months ago

Stellantis is mostly European, it's FIAT and Peugot with their other brands. I'm fairly certain they get enough subsidies and tax breaks. That this Italian/American/French company is registered in the Netherlands shows that some tax-dodging is involved as well. I think it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

(Also, Volkswagen Group is the bigger European car manufacturer.)

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Even in Europe Chinese cars are more popular because they're affordable.

[–] hagelslager@feddit.nl 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also, electric cars such as Polestar (Volvo's EV brand, also Chinese these days) look much better than Tesla's.

[–] romkube@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Hard to not look better than a manufacturer with a self-centered facist at the top

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Obviously, since they have the benefit of EU incentives that benefit all, and Chinese subsidies that only benefit manufacturing in China.

So I don't know what you mean by "Even in Europe"?

That doesn't mean EU should subsidize illegally and against general EU policy. Instead they are investigating if China production needs to have an import tax. Which is the correct way to handle this.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Once China stops committing genocide and constantly threatening to take over other countries by force I'll start caring about giving them equal tax breaks.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

Absolutely, I agree XI is as dangerous as Putin IMO, and we shouldn't grant China any favors.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 28 points 7 months ago

Capitalists suddenly stop loving corporate welfare when they aren't the ones benefitting from it.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Isn’t that what the tax credits are?

That said, it’s entirely reasonable for a country to levy tariffs on another country’s goods to support their own industries. Other countries do that to America.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

How many billions did this not founding member of Tesla did he get from government again?