948
submitted 4 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

In November 2017, Brazile said in her book and related interviews that the Clinton campaign and the DNC had colluded 'unethically' by giving the Clinton campaign control over the DNC's personnel and press releases before the primary in return for funding to eliminate the DNC's remaining debt from 2012 campaign,

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries#July_2016:_National_Convention_and_email_leaks

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago

We need a national movement to take the primaries out of the hands of the parties and run them like regular elections. Even better would be rank choice voting so we are no longer stuck with the two choices the wealthy give us.

[-] Shenanigore@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Maybe a national movement for a viable third party.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Tried and failed, over and over and over and over again, but sure, I'm sure it will end differently this time.

If we could get enough voter cooperation to replace one of the major parties, any strategy would work. If we can't then going third party is the worst possibile strategy.

[-] Shenanigore@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Things do change if people try.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

Oh, definitely. I'm not critiquing "optimism", just a particular strategy. There is no advantage that exists in a third party strategy that doesn't exist in a intra-party strategy, but there are a lot of disadvantages. Until we get rid of first-past-the-post elections, third parties can't overcome the spoiler effect.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
948 points (98.3% liked)

World News

31446 readers
1060 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS