this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
200 points (95.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5186 readers
585 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Also a huge number of people in the US travel to places that are walkable:

  • Disney World
  • Las Vegas (The strip is anyway)
  • DC
  • NYC
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The answer is to create shade. At those angles, you can find shade at any given time.

This is in frigging Phoenix Arizona. Nothing is walkable in 120 degrees.

Phoenix has a couple of these self contained communities already. The parking lot could be for people outside the community to come and visit the shops.

[–] livus@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

That's like 48°C, pretty hot! I don't think I could walk around in that. I take back some of my criticism.

Surely they need trees and covered areas though, not just boxy houses jammed in together like crooked teeth.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This part is my speculation, but the tightness, aside from shade, might be to give the illusion of small community solitude from the inside. Tempe is a very built -out city. More open, and you'll be looking at all the typical American sprawl bullshit and probably a freeway or two

[–] livus@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

@BossDj interesting hypothesis. I've never been to that part of the world, but your theory makes sense.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I think you're correct. I think this was likely min/maxing on the designers part. Assuming there were open / and 'green' spaces inside or within, say, a cluster of these I'm sure it would be generally acceptable for most people. My fear with designs such as these is vertical creep. What is nice and functional at 2-3 stories becomes a dystopian concrete labyrinth quite rapidly.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Shade is good - been in the south for 8ish years for work - It gets toasty down here.

A combination of artificial shade and greenery can have multiple benifits. (where applicable obviously - not all regions can support it nor should they try)

Shade can be functional too. There's been some interesting research into panels/pigments that radiate infared light at the wavelength that can escape our atmosphere producing a cooler than ambient surface that could have a variety of uses. A ton of recent advances in solar technology as well.