this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
305 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37801 readers
223 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was on the beta testing team and have been using Beeper for a little over two years now.

The convenience of having an application to house all of your chat networks is amazing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] admin@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will be offering a premium subscription offer for more bells and whistles other than the free option...I don't know anything about user betrayals conducted by Beeper.

[–] hypelightfly@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] admin@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't understand the concern here.

[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You have no way of verifying that the client is only doing what it claims. The Open Source community is highly suspicious of proprietary software, doubly so when it's based off of Open Source code.

If youre okay with that then no worries, but ofr myself and many others it's an absolute deal breaker.

[–] Cerothen@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, the client they provide to make bridging more accessible is proprietary, however you can fire up a fresh copy of element and connect it if you want and just use the text interface.

The clients are closed so that they have something to sell and profit. Not everyone can afford to give their time away for free.

[–] admin@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'll take the risk knowing what I know about the Beeper people that I've been working with for over two years.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

“I know these guys, trust me” is not a valid security assessment.

[–] irasponsible@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

If you know the team, then that's a pretty good reason to trust them. Only works if you know the team, though.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's fine... for you, right now.

But I (and probably most users) don't know them, over time people come and go, some even change who they are, businesses get sold. Only open source persists.

[–] admin@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thankfully all of the Matrix bridges they created for Beeper are open source.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, ok, I get it... but I'm still wary of a business model based on closed clients. Guess we'll see how it goes.

[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds reasonable to me