this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
360 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

58092 readers
4138 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly if you're a caring parent, don't let your child come near a chromebook.

[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I can tell you're not a parent. School systems choose these things without consulting us. Parents don't have much say in it. There isnt an opt-out.

So by your statement, because I can't afford to send my kid to private school, I must not be a caring parent.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 6 points 7 months ago

That's also assuming the private schools are any different too, and as if Windows is some holy grail of privacy instead.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 7 months ago

Then please, buy them a normal computer, even used, to play with at least 🙏.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What about parents who can't afford it?

What if the parent decided to put Linux on it? Is there any reason why a student can't just use a web browser to access everything?

[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Even if that were technically feasible from an interoperability perspective (which in many cases it is not, due to them using proprietary software) a parent putting Linux on it would certainly violate the acceptable use policy when the school inevitably finds out. Consequences from there will vary dramatically, but none are likely to be desirable outcomes. At the very least, they'd probably tell you to either restore the device, or pay for the cost of having their person do it.

Parents don't generally own these devices and are not going to be legally authorized to install software on them, generally. In the US, for example, unauthorized access along with "damaging" the device by removing the OS could very well be a crime (or several.) I doubt it would be prosecuted, but I personally don't have money to burn on lawyers.

edit: to be clear, where I live, these systems are typically owned either by the school system, or by a third party leasing agent.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is there any kind of fee that the parent has to pay for the student to use the laptop?

I thought how it worked was the school told the parents what laptop to buy and then the parents would have to buy it.

What if the parent decided to buy their kid a laptop instead of using the school-provided one?

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, because the schools own and manage the hardware they loan out.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ah. I thought the parents pay for the computers themselves.

What if the parents bought a laptop and refused the school-provided one?

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 7 months ago

I suppose it depends on the school, I'm sure they all have different policies depending on their IT department.