Technology

60106 readers

1967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

675

Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature (www.engadget.com)

submitted 10 months ago by d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 70 points 10 months ago (2 children)

there are half a dozen still very good reasons to keep this feature and one not to: lost ad revenue

assholes

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 8 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I can't imagine there was even that much lost revenue. Cached pages are good for seeing basic content in that page but you can't click through links or interact with the page in any way. Were so many people using it to avoid ads?

[–] NoRodent@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Were so many people using it to avoid ads?

I doubt that as well. There are much better ways to deal with ads. I always only used it when the content on the page didn't exist anymore or couldn't be accessed for whatever reason.

But I suspected this was coming, they've been hiding this feature deeper and deeper in the last few years.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

I honestly thought it was already gone.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

but you can't click through links or interact with the page in any way

Most of the time that's exactly what I want. I hate hunting through 473 pages of stupid bullshit in some janky forum to try to find the needle in that haystack.

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I feel like 99% of its usage was to avoid ads/paywalls/geo/account restrictions on news and social media sites

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago

You can't lose what you never had. It's desired ad revenue they're after.