this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
235 points (93.0% liked)

Games

15812 readers
468 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
235
Searches for 'Suicide Squad refund' surge 791% following the game's early access launch 'disaster' (www.windowscentral.com)
submitted 5 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You're right. It is a matter of perspective though. For the actual players, absolutely. It's always better to have self hosted matches and control the content yourself. But even in my example above, Overwatch could not sustain itself as a studio on the buy-once model, even with loot boxes. I still think they're doing it wrong and it fucking sucks, but the buy-once model lead to a developmentally dead game for a few years.

From game dev perspective, having a model that makes money over time allows the game to continue being updated without investment from outside sources.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can get money over time with the traditional model, just release content DLCs. I've spent hundreds on EU4 over the years, and I just treat their DLCs as buying a new game since it freshens up the experience for me. For MP, players get access to whatever DLC the host has, which works really well.

Overwatch could totally do that as well. DLCs could have:

  • playable characters/classes
  • game modes
  • maps/settings
  • SP campaigns

Nothing about the game requires an evergreen format. Some games do, such as CCGs like Hearthstone and Magic: Arena since they have frequent card releases and the games are designed around scarcity, but most of these don't.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I don't disagree with you. All I was really saying was that Overwatch specifically wasn't making money with its model