this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
984 points (91.7% liked)

Technology

60087 readers
3898 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 325 points 1 year ago (6 children)

According to Hwang, the company now formerly known as Twitter did offer "an alternative handle with the history of the @x account" so that his original account, complete with its posts and followers, could live on and continue to be used.

What short, catchy username did Musk's company change Hwang's handle to? @x12345678998765.

You can't make this shit up. God damn!

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 102 points 1 year ago (3 children)

that sounds like what an idiot would have for a password.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

So you are saying one could log into @x with that...

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quick someone check if it’s Elons password!

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah his password would definitely include an "42069" in it.

[–] elvith@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

Did you try xXx42069NoScopexXx?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's the same password I have on my luggage!

[–] xaxl@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

However, Hwang tells me, he was also offered a new handle of his choice – as long as it's available. He just hasn't picked one yet.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 105 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sam@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"as long as it's available" is as good as nothing imho.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

We'll a lot of people have left

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Musk probably wanted to make it @x42069.

[–] Valmond4@lemmy.mindoki.com 4 points 1 year ago

All for the buzz I imagine.

Or for some hyper inflated fragile ego I guess.

Well that's my guess.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's be real now. That name is temporary until he chooses his new one. Read the whole article. It's rediculous enough without making things seem even worse.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 23 points 1 year ago

But look at that username. It definitely not randomly generated. Someone at Twitter pick that new name. They just give someone with the shortest username possible (1 character) the longest possible username (15 characters), and they do so by pressing the number row back and forth until they hit the username characters size limit. If it's not a mockery then I don't know what is.