this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
232 points (90.6% liked)

World News

31540 readers
410 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PorkrollPosadist@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

For the love of god, listen to some Citations Needed and stop self-congratilating your media literacy because some fucking dork with a website tells you the New York Times and Washington Post aren't biased.

[–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

I'd thought that even the most liberal people on nü-Lemmy had at least read some Chomsky (or even watched the documentaries based on his work), but I guess we aren't even there yet.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think it’s hilarious people are telling me I need some nuance and research, when I’m the one arguing there are differences between these sources and we need to evaluate them individually. And the person I responded to is arguing they’re all the same because, well, Journalism Bad I guess!

For the love of god read the comments before you reply.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And the person I responded to is arguing they’re all the same because, well, Journalism Bad I guess!

If you only consider corporate media and western state-run and state-sponsored outlets to be purveyors of "Journalism," then let me emphatically say yes, Journalism Bad.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I definitely didn't say that.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

And yet the examples discussed follow those bounds

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think you're just doubling down on your bad arguments with straw man fallacies now. Move on.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Bad arguments" is a pretty rich take coming from you. You've done nothing but continually, in defiance of logic and facts, assert total nonsense... and then turn around and claim that I'm the one that has bad arguments.

Literally, at least I have something. All you've got is a mushy, unfactual "enlightened centricism" that says that actually all media and all fact checkers are liars. Which is an utterly moronic take, and as I have demonstrated all over this thread, totally unsupported by actual facts.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago

"In defense of logic and facts" FTFY.