569

Streaming Pirates Are Hollywood’s New Villains - Illegal subscription services that steal films or TV shows bring in $2 billion a year in ads and subscriber fees. (www.bloomberg.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

198 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This has to be stopped. Just look at what Napster did to the music industry. That’s right, there used to be a music industry and now it’s just…gone. No more music, no more money to be made in music. Don’t let these evil streaming services do the same to poor defenceless Hollywood, bastion of women’s rights!

[-] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

I haven't been able to listen to music since year 2000 😢

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Jokes aside, I have paid for Google's music service since it launched (RIP Play Music), but I am a millisecond away from canceling my subscription because Google does not provide me with any way to randomize playlists. I don't mean shuffle play. That shit is broken and always has been. It would not be a big deal if I could randomize my playlists on demand, but no.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 5 months ago

There's no such thing as pure randomness in computer science.

[-] Menteros@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Pure randomness isn't great for music playlists. The algo needs to account for recency so you don't hear the same some 6 times in a row. Technically still random but no one wants that.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

That's the difference between randomizing a playlist and shuffle play. If you randomize a playlist, the songs will never repeat unless you have them in the list twice. YouTube Music's shuffle play often plays the same twenty songs over and over out of a playlist with over six hundred songs.