Movies and TV Shows

3 readers

2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!

Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)

Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

admin@lemmy.film

111

Why SAG-AFTRA’s Streaming Revenue Sharing Proposal for Casts Was Flatly Rejected by AMPTP (www.hollywoodreporter.com)

submitted 11 months ago by realcaseyrollins@kbin.projectsegfau.lt to c/moviesandtv@lemmy.film

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The union would like performers "to share in the rewards of a successful show, without bearing any of the risk," the group that lobbies for studios says.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I agree with you in spirit but...

Those crappy movies make billions... The good movies are the risky ones!

Look at last year, of the top grossing movies the top one that was an original (non comic book, sequel or remake) was the 11th most porofitable (and Chinese so unsure if it was actually original.) The next? 16th overall, Elvis. Which pulled in 287 million, or about 12% of Avatar 2's take.

This year, well, we'll see what Barbie pulls but right now the top 9 box offices are all remakes, comic book movies or sequels.

So we can blame the studios all we like but our wallets seem to betray us, making those crappy movies the profitable ones.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Elvis was still part of a trend, though. While not an actual sequel or remake, it follows in the footsteps of prior successful musician-based biographical dramas like Rocketman or Bohemian Rhapsody.

[–] Acid@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hey at least the top gun sequel was actually good. I don't think Sequels should be branded as crap movies by default, Sure F&F X and so forth are garbage but there are some genuinely good sequels too.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Just because it wasn't dogshit doesn't mean it was good. It was generic crap with a decent production value that appealed to a wide audience.