Asklemmy

43149 readers

1741 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What does the Chinese idiom "A monkey that jumped out to pluck a peach" mean? (lemy.nl)

submitted 7 months ago by Sticker@lemy.nl to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I read translations of Chinese fanfics that have a lot of obscure idioms.
I can't find the meaning of these idioms on the internet.

Maybe there are some people here who are experts in this?

The idiom from the title is one character's reflection on the people who defeated their enemies.

This character thought, "They think they're strong, but they're like the monkey that jumped out to pluck the peach."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Mistral 8×7B that I have in front of me now says "A monkey that jumped out to pluck a peach" is often translated as "to jump the gun" in English, and refers to someone that is too eager to take an immediate but inappropriate step.

~~It also says the idiom is from the classical text "The Analects of Confucius, Book 12"~~

This is a smart offline open source model, but like everything AI, - citation needed as this is not a valid primary source.