this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
669 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

57997 readers
5876 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's why I like Kagi. I do almost anything to avoid ads

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not really no.
Kagi has vastly more features. Most are extremely useful. Including privacy.
And the whole "funding a bigot" complaint strikes me as kind of silly. The "partnership" is just them using the Brave search API, no different than they do Google, Bing, and a few others. I even have Brave as one of my sanity check browsers when something doesn't work on Firefox.

[–] muix@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

Privacy doesn't exist without the ability to compile and self host.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's silly to try to avoid doing anything that may, in some way support a bigot. They are literally everywhere. Even Gandhi was racist.

It's just the payment info, not the searches. And since their users are their only revenue source, because they aren't selling ads, they have no reason to save searches.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 7 months ago

You might think that under capitalism or something, animal cruelty might be a huge problem too, but I doubt you would buy bullets with the express intent of shooting dogs. (I hope.)

This seems like a non-sequitur. I don't understand your point here.

[–] wikibot@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Here's the section for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

= In 2017, Beale launched Infogalactic, an English-language wiki encyclopedia. The site was a fork of the contents of English Wikipedia which could be gradually edited to remove the influence of what Beale described as "the left-wing thought police who administer [Wikipedia]". It has been described by Wired and The Washington Post as a version of Wikipedia targeted to alt-right readers.

^to^ ^opt^ ^out^^,^ ^pm^ ^me^ ^'optout'.^ ^article^ ^|^ ^about^