Memes

45158 readers

3589 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml

sexy_peach@feddit.de

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

729

They are too expensive and gimicky either way (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 8 months ago by Justas@sh.itjust.works to c/memes@lemmy.ml

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can get a 55" gaming monitor.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

1700€

Fucking hell. Is the screen made of diamonds? It's 4x the price of a TV of the same size. What are they smoking?

[–] rifugee@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the smart TV's are being subsidized by the money they make selling the data they collect from you?

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure. But this doesn't account for the whole 1000€ difference in price.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Is it specifically advertised for gaming, with high refresh rate or something similiar?

[–] gornius@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Mainly GTG response time and latency. For watching movies it's generally not a problem, but when it comes to playing games with a mouse, latency can be a huge issue, and bad GTG response time leads to smearing.

But yeah, 4x the price is ridiculous.