PC Gaming

8550 readers

450 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

185

Portal 64 dev says “don’t be mad at Valve” for the project’s shutdown (www.pcgamesn.com)

submitted 10 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, because US game devs are so well known for their small install sizes. Are you serious?

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 2 points 10 months ago

I’m a little confused about what you mean. Is the implication that nobody (particularly employers) would care about being able to optimise a game because US games are so inefficient as demonstrated by their massive install sizes? That’s my guess but let me know if that’s incorrect. If my interpretation is correct then I don’t think that would make much of a difference. It’s not about needing to hire people who can do optimisation, it’s about the skill that went in to it and standing out from everybody else. If you were capable of learning that, on extremely old hardware with what I would assume requires a lot more manual work to do basic tasks compared to more modern game engines, imagine what they could do with all the extra tools!