132
Big Galaxy S24 leak reveals Samsung's strategy against Google's Pixel phone
(www.androidcentral.com)
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
132 points (90.7% liked)
Android
27317 readers
114 users here now
DROID DOES
Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
We are Android girls*,
In our Lemmy.world.
The back is plastic,
It's fantastic.
*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.
Our Partner Communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That is not the only big thing of pixels. To me it's the openness. These are, ironically, the best and easiest phones to leave google. Or at least root them without the evergrowing hassles of each iteration of samcraps.
Noone would ever buy a PC if they wouldn't get admin-access and mustn't install Linux or whatever. With phones they managed to keep us out.
i always found it funny that the best method of having a privacy focused phone (without having significant tradeoffs like the pinephone) is to buy the phone from the company who violates privacy the worst, and flashing over it.
True. This is why the general recommendation is typically to buy used. That way, they don't get additional revenue from the sale of a new phone, and it also decreases e-waste.
(Sure, the revenue may be a drop in the bucket, but it's still something.)
There's an argument to be made that buying used improves resale value and thus increases the price they can sell new, but I will not make it 😂
I think they probably break even or even sell these devices at a loss. The money is in the data-mining. And they want to show other OEMs/consumers what a "flagship" Android experience can/should look like.
Kinda like video game consoles are sold at a loss to subsidize game sales.
Realistically this only forms a tiny part of the population though, that's pretty much the only reason why they've been able to keep people out.
If only a tiny part of people care at all, why even make it sooooo complicated and change every damn update? Let people that WANT control, have control. The others don't care anyway and are scared enough by a "are you REALLY REALLY REALLY sure you know what you're doing here?"-security-question.
I don't pay 1000,- for a phone that isn't mine, and I hate that this has become the default.
On the one hand, I could see bad actors taking advantage of easily rooted/unlocked systems. Maleficent resellers could also take advantage.
Definitely give me the warnings and let me know what could happen, but let me unlock it and own it completely.
That's how it is usually when rooted. A confirmation is shown.
Or let it be set do decline by default and let the user explicitly change this. Problem solved. Of course malign intent wouldn't be benefical with pre-rooted-no-confirmation-phones 😌
I agree with you but to play devil's advocate, even for the simple issue of app sideloading on Android, there's no shortage of dumb users out there that willingly bypass all sorts of warnings and install apps that are very obviously malware.
... And? Does a system have to be adjusted to the lowest denominator?
If you use a thing, of which you have zero clues about, and still fuck around with it, you get what you ask for. People don't understand the slightest thing about the internet and still use it to go to "free" streaming-sites and whatnot.
I don't say rooting-per-default. But an easy option to do so. And also unlocking the bootloader. It's ok if it's hidden. And let it come with 5 security questions á la "u rly sure?". If someone doesn't know what he's doing, and still does it, and screws up, so be it. Charge the dumbnut in support.
Don't shoot the messenger lol. I'm in agreement with you.
Oh sorry, that wasn't meant to come across harsh 😊
Why not? They do it with phones all the time.
"you can't uninstall a system-app" (while trying to get rid of all the bloatware like mcaffee)
"you cannot upgrade to win8, but you can factory-reset your win7"
"you can only factory-reset 3 times, please call -support!"
"you don't have access to this file"
"defender has removed this 'malware' and there's nothing you can do about it'
"You can't install linux on this machine, this machine came bundled with Win7Home"
"you cannot install this program"
"you are not allowed to enter the bios"
"you cannot boot from this non-licensed device" (usb-stick)
etc.
One of these would probably do it :-)
exactly. the golden age was like 2015ish. great roms, easy to root, headphone jack, flat screens.