this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
1209 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

45536 readers
544 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ostracism only required a vote, no crime, and no defense was allowed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostracism

The penalty for returning was death.

Presumably even though there were no border controls, they would kill you if you returned.

Honestly, I’m not sure what the fixation with a guy in a booth is about. Whether you get denied entry and they throw you out, or if they exile or ostracize you, what’s the difference?

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Literally whether you can control human migration between territories.

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But if you can throw people out, and kill them when they come back why is it that different?

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Denying entry to random people is different than telling someone to leave?

Imagine the difference between a bar with a bouncer at the door and a bar without, and then apply that principle at a much larger scale.

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, it seems the same. If a bar doesn’t want Jews in it and the bartender asks everyone if they’re Jewish or a bouncer at the door feels like a distinction without a difference.

There’s no additional liberty, the people who own the bar set the rules.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

But it makes it much harder to control who is in a space, which means in practice there are additional liberties.