this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
91 points (90.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43328 readers
1022 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is it? I still have yet to try a distro that works properly with multiple monitors and supports all the software I have.
Iβve used Ubuntu, arch, fedora and PopOs and each one supported three monitors out of the box. Weird you have had issues.
My laptop is about 10 years old and has the Optimus dual nVidia/Intel GPU's, plus a DisplayLink adapter.
Ah, that makes a little more sense then. That's a pretty rare and nonstandard configuration.
When was the last time you tried? And Wine and other similar programs have come a long way. Especially what steamdeck/proton has done for gaming is insane.
I usually try Ubuntu Mate because I figure it's the most "normie" distro and should have good general hardware compatibility. I last tried it probably a year or two ago. It's been many years since I used Wine, but my lasting memory of it is that it's super clunky and buggy.
I ditched windows 12 years ago and never looked back. Its gotten easier every year and I rarely if ever have to tinker with anything. It just works. Ive had the same arch (btw) install the whole time just moving the image to new computers whenever I upgrade hardware.
I think I have replacements, equivalents, or Linux versions for most of my software, it's mainly the graphics drivers that suck with multiple displays. It constantly forgets the layout or leaves one of the displays inaccessible or just blank.
I also use DisplayLink for one of my monitors. I can't remember if that even worked at all.
If that could finally be fixed, it might push me to Linux.
Oh god, have they made another one already?
βwindows 10 will be the last version of windowsβ Remember that one? Pepperidge Farm remembers
For multimonitor setup you need to use Wayland and not X11
I've been running multi monitor setups on Xorg for decades.
X11 can support multimonitor but it will break if the monitors have different resolutions. That's why I suggested to use Wayland.
Nah. I use X11 with a 2k and an ultra wide. No problems at all.
There are a lot of cases that having different resolution can cause issues. I am glad you didn't have problem but this doesn't apply for everyone unfortunately
How are people supposed to know this? This is why Linux is hardly used for desktop. Everything requires custom knowledge.
They aren't, wayland is replacing X11 completely.
X11 is legacy and is soon to no longer ship by default anywhere.
Eventually, probably, but Cinnamon, XFCE, and MATE still don't support it, so I wouldn't call "soon."
Given that Mint is one of the most recommended beginner distros, this presents a problem.
Cinnamon is pretty much the only major desktop environment that isn't transitioning.
Mate and XFCE are both planning it and it seems relatively close for them, and since they're going to be using wlroots, once it's supported it won't be long for x11 to be gone.
Also, I think gnome/kde make up the VAST majority of linux desktop usage.