Android

27317 readers

215 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules

1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.

2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.

4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.

5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.

6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.

7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.

8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.

Community Resources:

We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.

Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

MargotRobbie@lemmy.world

Rooki@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

L3s@lemmy.world

_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world

213

So why did a jury find that Google held a monopoly but Apple didn’t? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 8 months ago by merde@sh.itjust.works to c/android@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Google has taken great pains to appear more open than Apple, licensing the Android operating system to third parties like Samsung and allowing users to install apps via other methods than the Play store. Apple does neither. When it comes to exclusivity, Apple has become synonymous with “walled garden” in the public imagination. So why did a jury find that Google held a monopoly but Apple didn’t?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kif@lemmy.nz 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I recall paying for an iPhoneOS update, Looks like it was iPhoneOS 2 or 3 from the first paragraph. I can't speak for anything else in the article, however.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, I'd have paid $10 just for copy/paste functionality on early ios, but I don't remember paying for anything when it came out on iOS 3

[–] OpenStars@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you're an OG iPhone or Mac user, then you might remember paid software updates. Over a decade ago, long before iOS 16 and macOS Ventura, major Apple OS updates used to cost users around $10 for iOS and $20 for macOS. By iOS 4, though, Apple switched to free software updates, allowing users to update their devices for as long as they're supported without having to pay a fee.

Yeah, but nowadays it's all "free" - as in you only pay for the hardware to enter their walled garden (but then no matter how much you pay, you can never really leave! at least not via normal, legal means, if you want to ever come back - Welcome to the Hotel California 🎶...!:-P).

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 1 points 8 months ago

Welcome to the Hotel California

Coincidentally, Apple is headquartered in California...