this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
611 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

55744 readers
3106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules::Phone-unlocking case law is "total mess," may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sometimes "crimes" are not crimes at all.

And sometimes you've done absolutely nothing wrong but prosecutors will use any information they can get their hands on as evidence of a crime, because they don't give a single fuck if they lock up a person they know full well is innocent for the rest of their lives, all they care about is a "win" in court.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're right. I know your response may seem implausible, but prosecutors have fought against the release of known innocent people.

It's not even that they'll try to get a win. It's that they can refuse to simply honor justice in its most fundamental forms.

[–] kambusha@feddit.ch 17 points 6 months ago

Central park 5 comes to mind

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

Cops have also been known to use "parallel construction" in order to launder evidence that would otherwise be considered inadmissible. It's fucked.