this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
231 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

55744 readers
3550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

The amount of downvotes on comments trying to help people not get price gouged and comments supporting these subscription price increases shows me just how many corporate shills are actually out there. No wonder these corps keep getting away with this bullshit.

Edit: Wow so many people took personal offense to this...almost like it they know it's true but are afraid to admit it. Everyone is hurting financially right now, some more than others. Yet year over year, the prices keep going up even with record inflation and record profits. Keep shilling folks, enjoy emptying your wallets for the millionaires while you struggle.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 1 points 11 months ago

Poeple think they are sharing their enormous profits with creators. Maybe they get a few bucks from the billions.

[–] soulifix@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I don't understand what shilling will earn for these people. The corps don't care about you. They never will and never have. Do these shills think there's some comfy bonus to be gained if they wave their flag around in support of greedy practices?

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I'm not going to defend the price increase, but a lot of comments in here are just aimless hatred of the idea of paying anything, ever.

Pound for pound, YouTube Premium has been a decent deal at $10. Has been. This is pushing it, but there's a lot of comments that seem absolutely indignant at the idea of paying YouTube period (and by extension the content creators).

There's got to be some room for nuance here. The internet is plagued by advertising and paywalls, yes, but it can also not exist without them, so we find some middle ground.

[–] MagicalPanda@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've been using the internet for over 24 years. I can tell you that the internet can survive without ads or paywalls. Ads and paywalls are a product of greed. Ads are way more efficient these days but many used to take up so much memory. I remember when AdBlock or whatever it was called came out. It made browsing the internet smoother.

[–] atomWood@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The only way the internet can survive without ads or paywalls is for the person/business hosting the content to pay for everything out of pocket.

A platform like YouTube could never exist without some form of revenue. I understand that there are small platforms out there, such as PeerTube, but they will never be comparable to the scale of YouTube without some form of revenue. Sure, people could grow PeerTube by spinning up their own instances, but then they need to provide their own hardware and storage. At which point you’re spending just as much, or likely more, than you would on a subscription service.

[–] variants@possumpat.io 2 points 11 months ago

I think its possible it will just be slow and requires people to sacrifice a bit just like we are trying to do with lemmy. maybe find a different route for ads like how Brave the browser does it where it give the user the choice to see ads and give them and the content creator a cut if they agree to it, not that I trust that browser but its an interesting concept

[–] Karza@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

It can definitely exist without advertising and paywalls. It just going to be smaller.

[–] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago

I think what you are seeing here so far is the organic result of those dumb enough to pay this kind of money for youtube being personally offended and defending their bad decisions.

We will get there but I'm not sure that this platform is large enough to be a major target for corpo bots just yet. Just dummies.

[–] BaldrOdinson@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's surprising to me. First moment I've thought maybe Lemmy is a worse place to be. Is there really that many astroturfing trolls here? Yikes.

[–] Ado@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

I can afford $13/month on my income and watch YT on a daily basis, much more than any other streaming service by a wide margain. Does that somehow make me an astroturfing troll?

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Ya how dare people actually pay for a platform that hosts billions of videos and streams to billions of users essentially lag free and is actually decent and shares revenue with it's content creators. /s

Things cost money. You don't have to be a corporate shill to not expect everything to be free, you just have to be an adult.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Google is one of the richest companies in the world.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Ok? And? They aren't a charity and don't owe you free video hosting services.

EDIT: I find it hilarious that point out the fact that you aren't entitled to free hosting services is getting down voted. Lmao how old are the people here?

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They were already being paid and profitable, both from direct cash and ad revenue, but that doesn't ever seem to be enough.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You are free to disagree with their pricing and cancel a subscription if you have one. That's how the free market works.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Free market works" is by itself a very questionable statement.

But there sure are some more options beyond that. Although some people think we shouldn't be free to pick them.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You are free to pick w.e you want. That doesn't make someone actually paying for a decent platform a corporate shill.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Our definitions of "decent" are definitely different. But this is not just about what you choose to do, it's about all the fingerwagging people do at people who don't believe this is worth paying (even more) for.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No but I'm not going to pay Google for anything. It's obscene to give them even more money.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Whether you think that service is worth it or not is up to you.

But don't act like you have some moral high ground here and that people who are actually paying for a service that you are stealing from and a service that actually shares revenue with it's content creators and encourages independent creators are just corporate shills.

Some of us are adults and realize things cost money and not entitled children that expect everything for free.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And some of us are adults that don't have your innate need to wield your moral high ground like a smug pedantic asshole.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am not the one calling anyone who isn't pirating a corporate shill.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And yet that's obivously not what this thread's context was before you started self-jerking to moral superiority.

Have some self awareness.

This isn't a Wendys Drive Thru.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Here, since you have difficulty following, let me copy where the original thread started.

The amount of downvotes on comments trying to help people not get price gouged and comments supporting these subscription price increases shows me just how many corporate shills are actually out there. No wonder these corps keep getting away with this bullshit.

I am not the one who started the moral superiority, I just disagreed at being called a "corporate shill" before a bunch of insecure assholes started losing their shit.

Maybe try having self awareness yourself before suggesting it to someone else.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Self inserting as a main character to claim you've been attacked so you can shill your moral superiority is the cherry on top of your bullshit sundae.

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And I don't owe them a subscription if I don't agree with the value they've placed on it. Free market, baby. 👍

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, absolutely, you don't. No one is claiming otherwise.

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You seem oddly offended at the idea people wouldn't lol. I don't know why you're taking this so personally.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No I just think it's stupid to call people who would pay for a service a corporate shill. I have no issue with someone who doesn't think a subscription is worth it. Maybe read the whole thread first next time.

[–] Gork@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Dude they sell our data to advertisers and big data for profit. The least they can do is provide some services for us for the amount of analytics they collect from us on a daily basis.

[–] ComplacentGoat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Dude, they ARE the advertiser. That's Google's main business. They have no incentive to export ANY of your account data to 3rd parties. Business tell them what groups of people to advertise to, and their systems handle the rest. They're open about how it all works.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As someone who's actually worked in this industry, your data isn't enough to pay for video hosting services to the scale youtube provides. Youtube makes up a significant chunk of all network traffic in the world. It costs money.

[–] ttr@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're a content creator, aren't you? 🤣

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No i am not. But I am happy to support actual content creators and the platform that they host on and gets them the most views because I spend more time on YT than I do on any other streaming platform.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But I am happy to support actual content creators and the platform that they host on and gets them the most views

It's too bad youtube doesn't do that, lol.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I mean that is objectively not true.

[–] Shrek@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They pay content creators more than any other platform to my understanding. I think the exception is kik (kick?) The streaming platform.

[–] xts@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Too bad you constantly have to be worried about dumb policy changes that can affect your older videos which can mean cutting off those revenue sources

Also I’ve never seen another platform that demonetizes content as much as YouTube does.

[–] Shrek@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Both very fair points. But, there is no other platform that even compares for real.

[–] Thadrax@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I get that, but the vast majority of content creators seem to make their money with sponsorships or their own ads, so most of what google is doing is content distribution, not creation. Which makes the amount of money they want for that seem ridiculous when pretty much every other streaming service that produces high profile and expensive shows themselves is way cheaper.

This feels like your supermarket requiring entrance fees in addition to you having to pay for stuff you actually buy.

[–] ConfirmingMoose@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I see.

We are at fault for youtube giving shit away for free. We are responsible for youtube's profits.

We not only need to offer content FOR FREE to youtube ... but then accept that we must pay youtube for our content.

Get fucked.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Before telling others to get fucked, maybe learn to read and grow the fuck up.

YT shares revenue with content creators. No one is offering shit for free.

Things cost money, wether you think the service is worth it or not is up to you, but no one owes you shit just because you are an entitled prick.

[–] ConfirmingMoose@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am a grown up. But I have little tolerance for corporate cheerleaders of any shape or sound.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok feel free to build your own alternative.

[–] ConfirmingMoose@reddthat.com -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh take your ball and go home already.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

You should take your own advice. Your bs hasn't worked.