this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
254 points (91.0% liked)

News

22838 readers
6132 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden goes into next year's election with a vexing challenge: Just as the U.S. economy is getting stronger, people are still feeling horrible about it.

Pollsters and economists say there has never been as wide a gap between the underlying health of the economy and public perception. The divergence could be a decisive factor in whether the Democrat secures a second term next year. Republicans are seizing on the dissatisfaction to skewer Biden, while the White House is finding less success as it tries to highlight economic progress.

“Things are getting better and people think things are going to get worse — and that’s the most dangerous piece of this," said Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, who has worked with Biden. Lake said voters no longer want to just see inflation rates fall — rather, they want an outright decline in prices, something that last happened on a large scale during the Great Depression.

“Honestly, I’m kind of mystified by it,” she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 98 points 9 months ago (24 children)

Whenever anyone says "the economy", you can and should mentally substitute it with "rich people's yacht money".

Rich people's yacht money doing well doesn't do shit for 90% of the population. It doesn't pay the rent, put food on the table or clothes on their back. They can't afford to see a doctor or ride the damn bus.

And you want them to be happy because some stockbroker is getting a second holiday in the Maldives this year?

Stupid arrogant fucks.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

That's why they say "unemployment being too low is bad for the economy". Low unemployment means higher negotiating power for workers, which means higher wages and better working conditions. The only way that statement makes any sense is if they're exclusively talking about yacht money.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

But the rules of supply and demand should only apply to the consumer, not the producer.

[–] radiosimian@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Don't even start on the wage-inflation-spiral idea. It's the workers' fault for wanting higher wages as it allows service-oriented business to charge higher prices, driving inflation.

While the theory probably has roots in real-world pricing algorithms (eg how much can we charge people in X region for Netflix) that rise in cost contributes to inflation figures. The fact that wages have been stagnant for decades undermines the whole argument.

"Well the poors can afford it and the shareholders will love it!" FFS

[–] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Low unemployment means higher negotiating power for workers

Too bad all those "right to work" people have been actively fighting against negotiation powers for workers. But lets blame the 'yacht owners' and piss and moan about how they take advantage of the lopsided negotiation powers we voted in for them.

I know! We should put exclusively yacht owners in power! They'll totally fix it. /s

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Similarly, when they say NAIRU, you can and should mentally substitute "inexhaustible scab labour pool".

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

When people say they’re not happy about the economy, this is the shit they’re talking about, not statistics.

Ordinary people get fucked in this economy, and there isn’t any party that can do anything about it.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They’d like to do something about it. But they can’t get elected.

Unless there’s something else they’re planning.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

'Murica had a chance in 2016 but the DNC decided "nah".

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’ll say it an umpteenth time: good fash/bad fash afab.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Bernie would have won, and the last 8 years would have been vastly different.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Al Gore ran and would have won but republicans stole that one. It’s more complex than “DNC is icky”

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The DNC manipulated the vote between Clinton and Bernie so Clinton would win the nomination.

They're not "icky" ... they're manipulative assholes.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Except they didn’t manipulate the vote and you’re just quoting trump:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/926247543801044993?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fblogs%2Fblog-briefing-room%2F358565-trump-dnc-tried-to-illegally-steal-primary-from-sanders

Best there was was a fundraising agreement that favored the established candidate, could have done better but that’s not manipulating the vote unless you’re an idiot.

Meanwhile Bernie’s caucuses with fascists? You sound like you have no grasp Of the world because anyone less than pure is a facist to you while actual fascist get voted in because of you ignorance and apathy.

Again Bernie endorses and caucuses with democrats. Because they rigged the vote? You realize how aligned he is with the dem party and works with their establishment. So he’s a fascist too?

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

But they’re Rainbow Fascists, so they’re better than Trump… right? Right??

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

No worries. I have a hard time reading between the lines, myself.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Politics literally sets the rules. If you can get an elected majority you can certainly do something about it.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

To fix things we would need one party to take over 153 separate branches of government.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

What could possibly go wrong with a one-party state?

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not at all. You’re missing the forest for the trees lmao

The problem is that no matter how much inflation goes down, if the price gouging capitalists that own the grocery stores, the gas stations, and so on don’t stop.

It’s not about rich people’s yacht it’s about the American people being taken advantage of simply because they can. The economy is doing a lot better, record low unemployment for example is a huge metric here but what difference does that make when the grocery stores are selling less for more money?

You’re crying about rich people’s yachts when you should be crying about record price gouging without any cause. Those yachts don’t have impact on the average American’s QoL but price gouging absolutely does.

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

When investors do better, nobody else does better. The whole system is based on harvesting wealth from society as a whole, and concentrating it in the top 1%. Ever hear of the Gini coefficient?

Yes, price-gouging companies jacking up their prices and paying fuckall in wages are the direct instrument of suffering. But they do so in order to provide yacht money for the investor class, and in so doing they impoverish literally everyone else.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago

The uh... the yachts are payed for with price gouging my dude. 😕

load more comments (21 replies)