this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Open Source

30284 readers
617 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml
0
Is there a creative commons or other open access art license that prevents it from being used to train AI? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I really don't want my photos, writings, etc to be used for things like StableDiffusion or ChatGPT, but some of them I still want to release under an open access license that's free for others to use in conventional derivative works, just specifically not AI. Does such a license exist?

Or at the very least, if my work is to be used to train AI, then I think the final models and neural networks themselves need to be open source and also free for anyone to use (as in, people should be able to download and run the AI on their own computer, not have to use the company's web app. Does CC-BY-SA protect against this since it requires that any derivative works also be released under the same license? Does it work like GPL in that regard?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have no actual answer, but given the very messy state of AI legality right now, I imagine it could be a while before we're even able to define everything well enough to establish a solid legal framework for this sort of thing.

That said, I'd be happy to be proven wrong - this is definitely an important idea for society moving forward.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, is copyright not specifically designed (by the big corporations mind you) to default to not allowing content to be used unless permission is explicitly given by the rights holder? So shouldn't the answer to whether any content can be used is a big NO unless the author or distributor specifically allows it to be used?

[–] azuth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's this thing called fair use .

The usage is clearly limited as can be determined by size of trained materials versus size of models. I would argue the use is transformative enough, after all you got from text/image inputs to effectively a tool that can produce texts and images.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

If I write a story too similar to a Disney movie I will get sued, yet this is okay? Wtf