this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
527 points (87.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43699 readers
1645 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFriendlyArtificer@beehaw.org -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

From a human experience standpoint, Fahrenheit is more meaningful than Celsius.

0°F - Too damned cold 100°F - too damned hot

0°C - Jacket weather 100°C - He ded

[–] tleb@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

This is a terrible take for a lot of climates.

[–] Donut@leminal.space 6 points 10 months ago

I'd argue Celsius makes more sense from a human experience standpoint. Too damned cold or hot is highly subjective. The freezing and boiling points of water are easy references.

Although technically the boiling point of water can change where you are in the world. But from neighbour to neighbour, you will have the same effects

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Easy. Just adjust your personal scale:
0°C = Jacket weather
30°C (humid) = Very hot
30°C (dry) = Tolerable
35°C (humid) = Too damn hot

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 0 points 10 months ago

On the other hand, if you like whole numbers Fahrenheit provides more precision.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 10 months ago

0 to 100 is always easier to remember than any numbers in between. Oddly enough, it's the metric system that is supposed to be better at exactly this.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

I like it better for cooking, especially for sous vide. One degree C is too wide of a range, but 0.1C is too precise. One degree F is just right.

Conversely, grams are way better than ounces for measuring things. My coffee needs 700ml of water. I can get that precisely by measuring 700g on a scale.

Basically, measuring system purity is not a virtue. Flexibility is.